Senior Care Records.

Columbia Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

1506 NORTH MAIN STREET, Columbia, MS, 39429

Nursing home119 licensed beds0 citations on record
2 more within 6 milesOpen in Maps
Has this facility been cited?

Yes. Federal inspectors cited 6 deficiencies against Columbia Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center in Columbia, Mississippi at its most recent standard inspection on 2025-09-11. Medicare rates it 3 out of 5 overall.

3 / 5Medicare overall rating
119certified beds
6deficiencies at the last inspection
0immediate-jeopardy findings on record
0actual-harm findings on record
0federal fines
What the inspectors found

Every deficiency on record, by how serious CMS judged it

CMS grades each finding from A to L on two axes: how badly residents were affected, and how many. These are its bands, not ours. The figures cover every standard and complaint survey on record, which is a longer window than the rating cycle above.

Immediate jeopardyA resident was placed in immediate danger. The most serious band CMS uses.0
Actual harmA resident was harmed, but not placed in immediate danger.0
Potential for more than minimal harmNo resident was harmed, but the failing could have caused it.9
Potential for minimal harmThe least serious band.0
Most recent

The last 9 findings, newest first

Each is the federal requirement the home was found not to meet, in CMS’s own wording, with the tag number so it can be looked up against the inspection report.

Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · F0640 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · F0656 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · F0658 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · F0677 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · F0804 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

Infection Control Deficiencies · F0880 · 2025-09-11 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · F0693 · 2024-05-09 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · F0600 · 2024-02-06 · from a complaint · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

Infection Control Deficiencies · F0880 · 2022-06-16 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D
Medicare’s own rating

How CMS scores this home

These stars are Medicare’s, not ours — we publish no rating of our own. They are reproduced here because they are part of the public record.

OverallCombines the three below3 of 5
Health inspectionBased on the last three inspection cycles4 of 5
StaffingNurse hours per resident, adjusted for how sick residents are3 of 5
Quality measuresResident outcomes reported by the home1 of 5
Nurse hours per resident per dayReported by the home to CMS3.89768
Nursing staff turnoverShare of nursing staff who left in a year44.8%
Ownership

Who owns Columbia Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Nursing homes are frequently owned through layers of companies, and the name over the door is rarely the one that holds the licence. This is the ownership CMS has on file.

OwnerRoleShareSince
NEXION HEALTH OF OHI INCOrganization100%since 03/29/2018
NEXION HEALTH LEASING, INC.OrganizationNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/29/2018
BOLT, BRETTONIndividualNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/29/2018
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividualNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/29/2018
CARPENTER, SHAWNIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 07/01/2018
HERDRICH, WILLIAMIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
LEE, BRIANIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
RINER, MEERAIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
KIRLEY, FRANCISIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
LEE, BRIANIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018
RINER, MEERAIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 03/29/2018

Part of the NEXION HEALTH group.

Nearby

Other licensed providers within six miles

Listed by distance. Nobody paid to appear here and the order is not for sale.

The Grove

Columbia · 2.4 mi · 86 beds

Citations0Substantiated0
Contact

Ask Columbia Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center a question

This page has not been claimed, so messages sent here would reach nobody. Call them instead — we take no commission either way, so we have no reason to steer you anywhere.

What is needed

Columbia Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has not claimed this page, so there is nobody here to deliver a message to. We will not take your details and sit on them. Call them on 6017369557 — the number is from their licence record.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Nursing Home Care Compare. Retrieved 2026-07-29. Facility number 255227.
Figures reproduce the state’s own totals and are not re-aggregated. Methodology · Report a correction