Senior Care Records.

Graceville Health Center

1083 SANDERS AVENUE, Graceville, FL, 32440

Nursing home147 licensed beds0 citations on record
LocationOpen in Maps
Has this facility been cited?

Yes. Federal inspectors cited 3 deficiencies against Graceville Health Center in Graceville, Florida at its most recent standard inspection on 2026-02-26. Medicare rates it 4 out of 5 overall.

4 / 5Medicare overall rating
147certified beds
3deficiencies at the last inspection
0immediate-jeopardy findings on record
0actual-harm findings on record
0federal fines
What the inspectors found

Every deficiency on record, by how serious CMS judged it

CMS grades each finding from A to L on two axes: how badly residents were affected, and how many. These are its bands, not ours. The figures cover every standard and complaint survey on record, which is a longer window than the rating cycle above.

Immediate jeopardyA resident was placed in immediate danger. The most serious band CMS uses.0
Actual harmA resident was harmed, but not placed in immediate danger.0
Potential for more than minimal harmNo resident was harmed, but the failing could have caused it.3
Potential for minimal harmThe least serious band.0
Most recent

The last 3 findings, newest first

Each is the federal requirement the home was found not to meet, in CMS’s own wording, with the tag number so it can be looked up against the inspection report.

Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · F0806 · 2026-02-26 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · F0842 · 2026-02-26 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D

Keep all essential equipment working safely.

Environmental Deficiencies · F0908 · 2026-02-26 · standard survey · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm

D
Medicare’s own rating

How CMS scores this home

These stars are Medicare’s, not ours — we publish no rating of our own. They are reproduced here because they are part of the public record.

OverallCombines the three below4 of 5
Health inspectionBased on the last three inspection cycles4 of 5
StaffingNurse hours per resident, adjusted for how sick residents are2 of 5
Quality measuresResident outcomes reported by the home4 of 5
Nurse hours per resident per dayReported by the home to CMS3.6345
Ownership

Who owns Graceville Health Center

Nursing homes are frequently owned through layers of companies, and the name over the door is rarely the one that holds the licence. This is the ownership CMS has on file.

OwnerRoleShareSince
GRACEVILLE HEALTH MEMBER, LLCOrganization100%since 10/07/2022
FLNHO CAPITAL GROUP LLCOrganizationNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/08/2022
PREMIER 4 OPCO PARTNERS LLCOrganizationNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/08/2022
ZBL-18 LLCOrganizationNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/08/2022
FISCHEL, MAYERIndividualNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/08/2022
VARGHESE, MATHEWIndividualNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/08/2022
PETERSON, JENNIFERIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 10/08/2022
LANDA, BENJAMINIndividualNOT APPLICABLEsince 10/08/2022

Part of the BENJAMIN LANDA group.

Contact

Ask Graceville Health Center a question

This page has not been claimed, so messages sent here would reach nobody. Call them instead — we take no commission either way, so we have no reason to steer you anywhere.

What is needed

Graceville Health Center has not claimed this page, so there is nobody here to deliver a message to. We will not take your details and sit on them. Call them on 8502634447 — the number is from their licence record.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Nursing Home Care Compare. Retrieved 2026-07-29. Facility number 105662.
Figures reproduce the state’s own totals and are not re-aggregated. Methodology · Report a correction