Complaint Investigation Report
noted that R1 was prescribed medication to address the seizure activity. The investigation did not yield evidence that indicated that immediate or emergency medical attention was needed each time R1 exhibited seizure activity or that R1 experienced a seizure following which needed medical attention was not sought. Additionally, the investigation produced no evidence that R1 experienced a seizure at the time of the alleged incident.
Records retained relative to R2 reflected that R2 was at risk for falls. Interviews also yielded that the facility had procedures in place for staff to follow in response to resident falls. The investigation did not yield evidence of a fall sustained by R2, following which R2 was not assessed or that needed medical attention was not sought.
Based upon the foregoing, the allegation is unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegation may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Stefanie Ancheta, and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the Executive Director at the conclusion of the visit.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction