Complaint Investigation Report

The second allegation indicates resident not receiving diet as ordered. S1 stated the facility during this time was doing a weight loss challenge with the clients at the facility reason why C1 was losing weight. Facility was increasing walking and activities to avoid client from gaining weight, keep them healthy, and something to do during COVID. C1’s doctor and social worker are aware of C1’s weight loss. S2 and S3 stated C1 eats regular meals and is also being taken to the gym regularly. S2 and S3 stated per doctor’s order C1 was to lose weight for health reason. C1’s IRC case workers stated they had no concerns with C1’s weight lose and that facility is following doctor’s recommendations in assisting C1 to lose weight. LPA reviewed recent nutritional recommendations for C1 that states to follow a 2,000-calorie meal plan with portions. LPA also reviewed C1’s Individual Program Plan (IPP) that states C1 is to follow a calorie diet per doctor’s orders.

Based on the information obtained, the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.

An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Kolice Sattiewhite