Senior Care Records.

Complaint Investigation Report

Meraki of Sacramento, Sacramento12/12/2024Licence 347000008

Census12
Date signed12/12/2024 01:02:05 PM
The inspector’s account

Administrator, Darius Stir, at the time of the incident, did not consult with the appropriately skilled professional to design a incontinence care program.

LPA also conducted a collateral visit at the facility R1 had relocated to. R1 was found to be out of bed. R1 was clean dry and odor free an R1’s bed/ bedding was odor free.

As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (A)This poses an immediate Health and Safety risk to clients/residents in care. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safety risk, or personal rights violation, to clients/residents in care.

Report reviewed with Samantha Shaw . Copy of this report and appeal rights provided.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction