Complaint Investigation Report

LPA also interviewed the 2 residents (R1 and R2). This LPA went to R1's room to asked if they could speak privately in the backyard. When asked about the food supply and staffing, R1 replied that they got plenty to eat and that staff were "cool and very helpful." R2 was unresponsive, but was well groomed, seemed content to watch TV in the living room and this LPA observed the dishes leftover from breakfast soaking in the sink. This LPA was told that R2 had eaten earlier.

This LPA also interviewed the Service Coordinator for R1 and was told that they had been at the facility on 07/09/26 and did not note any concerns at that time regarding food and they met that regional center's requirements for staffing.

LPA toured the 4 resident bedrooms and 1 bathroom along with common areas, garage and yard. LPA observed the staff schedule and compared it to the Guardian Roster to ensure that all staff were appropriately background cleared. All was in compliance at the time of this inspection.

Based on observations and interviews with R1, the Administrator and Kabia, as well as the Service Coordinator for R1, the allegations below were UNSUBSTANTIATED.

Licensee does not ensure that staff are present at the facility while residents are in care.

A finding of unsubstantiate d means that the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there was not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.

According to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit. A copy of this report was provided along with APPEAL RIGHTS and an exit interview was conducted with the Designee, Abdul Kabia.