Complaint Investigation Report

To add to that, LPA Brown reviewed C1's recent Individual Program Plan (IPP) from Inland Regional Center (IRC) Consumer Services Coordinator (CSC) indicating C1's false statement behavior. Evidence also showed that when C1 was interviewed by Riverside County Sherrif Officer with members of the Community Behavioral Analysis Team (CBAT) that C1 recanted C1’s statements and admitted that no staff at the facility masturbated C1 at the home.

There is insufficient evidence to prove that Staff sexually abused client in care. The evidence also demonstrates that C1 admitted lying and reported that C1 was not sexually abused at the home. Therefore, based on the evidence obtained during the Department's investigation, the allegation of Staff sexually abused client in care is unsubstantiated at this time. Although the allegation Staff sexually abused client in care may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time.

An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee Emmanuel Oyebobola.