Complaint Investigation Report

Witness claimed S1 reacted angrily toward the incident causing them to step outside the facility and leave their shift earlier than scheduled. In addition, administrator suspended S1 to conduct an internal investigation, employee resigned from Neema Homes before suspension was cleared.

Based on LPA’s interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED . California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8, are being cited on the attached 9099-D.

Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation and the Health and Safety Code. Appeal rights given and discussed with Administrator. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties.

Exit interview conducted and report given to Licensee.