Complaint Investigation Report

LPA conducted an interview with R1's Kaiser Hospice Nurse, (H1) who informed LPA that R1 was not receiving services from Kaiser prior to being placed on hospice and that H1 and Kaiser Vacaville did not have documentation indicating when R1's wounds developed. In addition, based on interview with former Licensee (I2) it was denied that R1 sustained wounds under I2’s care. The Licensee was contacted by telephone and reviewed report with LPA.

Allegation, facility sustained a resident with prohibited condition, is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. Appeal Rights Given

Deficiency cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties.