Complaint Investigation Report

Complaint alleges facility did not supervise clients in care involving client (C1) allegedly victimized in an unwanted sexual advance from client (C2). Based upon interviews with staff (S1) and client (C2), information provided was contradicting from allegation. LPA attempted but was unable to interview C1 due to refusal at initial contact. Upon following attempts, phone contact for C1 was found to be disconnected. In addition, It was found that Fairfield Police Department had conducted an additional interview with C2 regarding the allegation. A pending police report has been requested. Due to a lack of corroborating evidence the allegation is unsubstantiated. However, the department may reopen investigation based on police report findings.

A finding that the complaint allegations, facility did not serve appropriate foods resulting in client weight loss

and facility did not supervise clients in care are unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED.