Complaint Investigation Report

Based on interviews conducted and records obtained the investigation revealed that C2 was unable to describe the details of how C1 touched them inappropriately during both incidents. In addition, to further mitigate future incidents the facility indicated to the department investigator they are looking to move C2 to a separate facility.

Based on a confidential interview conducted with former staff member (S3) who was working at the time of both incidents, it was revealed that neither C1 nor C2 required constant, line-of-sight supervision, a claim that was backed up by medical record review. S3 also revealed that they did not physically see either event as they happened.

Interviews with C2 confirmed that none of the staff or other clients physically saw either events of 10/17/2025 or 10/20/2025 and C2 further relayed the fact that they did not report the events of 10/20/2025 that occurred in the backyard of the facility to other clients or staff at the facility, until making their concerns known to outside party.

Based on interviews, record and video reviews, the allegation of C2 being sexually abused by C1 or of that of a Personal Rights violation is Unsubstantiated.

A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.

Report was reviewed with RP, whose signature denotes receipt.