Complaint Investigation Report

During the investigation, it was found that resident (R1) made consistent statements to the police department and to the Department (Community Care Licensing Division) regarding S1 and S2.

Based on interview with R1, it was stated that S1 was buying him/her food in exchange for sexual favors. S1 admitted to buying R1 food twice and driving R1 and other residents in the community and back to the facility per R1’s request. S1 also admitted to calling and texting R1 on several occasions and giving R1 money, food and cigarettes.

Based on interview with the Administrator, it was stated that R1 had S1’s phone number saved on his/her phone and confirmed the number saved was S1’s phone number after comparison. ADM had possession of R1’s phone and all the messages between R1 and S1 were deleted.

Based on staff interviews, staff were not aware of the allegation regarding R1 and S1.

Based on interview with R1, it was stated that R1 had intercourse with S2 on four occasions, three times when S2 drove R1 to appointments and one time in a vacant room at the back of the facility. R1 stated the sexual encounters were not consensual but never told S2 “no” or “stop”. R1 stated to be pregnant with S2’s baby but later terminated the pregnancy.

ADM had possession of R1’s phone and all the messages between R1 and S2 were deleted.

Based on interview with the Administrator, it was stated that any staff who is trained to be a driver can drive residents of any gender to appointments, and S2 was trained.

Based on staff interviews, staff were not aware of the allegations between R1 and S2, however, when thinking back, staff recalled how S2 made statements that stood out when R1 provided ADM his/her phone and consented to a search. It was stated that S2 made a “big deal” about searching R1’s phone and said it was illegal. Page 2 of 3.