Complaint Investigation Report
Interviews also revealed that no corroborated evidence existed to suggest that actions describing inappropriate interaction between S1 and R1 occurred while residing at Delta at the Sherwoods. A review of staffing file did not indicate previous disciplinary action or history of inappropriate interactions with residents. As part of this investigation, a review of R1’s needs and service plan and physician’s report revealed a history of paranoia and hallucinations. As a result of the above evidence reviewed, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with a resident, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.
A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with acting administrator and a copy of this report was provided. Appeal rights provided.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction