Complaint Investigation Report
Interviews further revealed that an attempt was made to discharge R1 back to facility, however, record reviews revealed R1’s ambulatory status was updated to reflect “bedridden.” A further review of R1’s updated physician’s report dated 12-16-2025 revealed facility does not possess a bedridden clearance, and therefore, unable to accept R1 based on regulatory guidelines. Interviews conducted with R1 and additional witnesses revealed that a local skilled nursing facility did accept R1, however, R1 wished to return home with responsible person in lieu of facility. Additional interviews further revealed that facility was willing to accept R1 back if bedridden exception would be obtained, however, R1 wished to return home with responsible person.
As a result, based on interviews and record reviews, it is determined that there is not a preponderance of evidence to conclude that facility engaged in an illegal eviction process, therefore, this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of unsubstantiated means the allegation may have happened or is valid, but there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, and a copy of this report was provided.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction