Senior Care Records.

Facility Evaluation Report

G.l.o.m. A.r.f. 6, Lodi12/26/2025Licence 392700752

Capacity46
Census45
Date signed01/12/2026 10:39:55 AM
Name of licensing program analystNoel Wolf Petersen
Name of licensing program managerLiza King
The inspector’s account

Licensing Program Analyst, LPA, Noel Wolf Petersen arrived unannounced, 12/26/2025 9:15am to the facility to conduct an annual inspection, LPA met with facility managers Geraldo Varela and Joanni Rincon, and later Administrator Alex Archangel by phone explained the purpose of the visit. GLOM ARF 6 is an adult residential facility for adults aged 18-59, there are 45 amublatory, 0 nonambulatory, and 0 bedridden residents. 0 residents have a restricted care condition at the time of the inspection, 6 clients have insulin dependant diabetes, controlled under their own power.

Physical Plant was inspected, including the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, common areas, storage areas, exteriors, and evacuation routes.

Facility is clean, traffic areas are unobstructed and well lit.

Kitchen has adequate food stored for 2 days perishable, 7 days non perishable, LPA notes some undated chopped veg in the fridge, and a quart of heavy cream expiring tomorrow. LPA gave guidance to do a quarterly inventory for dust/bulges/dents/dates of the canned goods and keep a date on everything possible to prevent the possibility of serving expired foods. Kitchen has adequate lockable storage for sharps and toxics, such that no chemicals are dripping onto sharps used for food prep.

Medication for 5 clients was checked against an electronic mars. Medications and mars match. Refusal documentation process is adequately detailed to provide reason, PRN documentation process is adequatedly detailed to provide reason and result, Medication destruction record has double signatory space. LPA gave guidance that if a drug arrives from the pharmacy, not in the condition it was expected, that should be documented in a general note. LPA gave guidance that if a mediction is being repeatedly refused that the perscribing doctor be looped into a discussion about if that care could be staged down, and vice versa if a PRN is being repeatedly given the percribing doctor be looped into a discussion if that care could be staged up.

Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction