Complaint Investigation Report

However, AD stated that that AD had not provided written notice to the representatives/responsible persons for R1 or R2 and had not provided Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) with copies of the eviction notices. After LPA’s inspection on 08/19/22, LPA provided technical assistance to AD regarding eviction notices and AD properly re-served the eviction notices on R1 and R2. Interviews revealed that R1 and R1’s responsible person were threatened by AD that once the 30-day notice period was over, R1’s belongings would be removed from the facility to ensure that R1 leaves. When interviewed, AD could not recall what he had said to R1 and R1’s responsible person about the procedure for the eviction.

During the course of the investigation, the Department obtained sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation mentioned above. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is Substantiated. See LIC9099D for cited deficiencies per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.