Complaint Investigation Report

and reported that S1 is a vendor for the soda machine. Per Administrator Assistant, S1 is supervised when refilling the soda vending machine and reported that S1 would not touch any client inappropriately.

Based on LPA's observations and information gathered during the investigation, LPA is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported due to conflicting information. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED.

LPA Ramirez conducted an exit interview with WC Alonzo and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.