Complaint Investigation Report

During the course of the investigation, a history of episode discharge for C1 was obtained and an interview was conducted with the Medical Doctor (MD), Witness 1 (W1), who was the discharge practitioner for C1 on March 15, 2021. Per W1, C1 would not have been able to leave the facility unassisted at that time due to the high probability of relapse and possibility of illegal substances being brought back into the facility.

Based on staff interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of regulations. (See LIC9099-D). An exit interview interview was conducted and a copy of this report, and appeal rights were left at the facility.