Complaint Investigation Report

Interview conducted with Administrator denied this allegation. Administrator indicated alleged interaction involving foul language towards C1 did not happen. Interview conducted with C1 confirmed the allegation to be true. C1 indicated that on 03/02/22, Administrator used foul language towards C1. Phone interview conducted with Witness #1 also confirmed the allegation to be true. Witness #1 was present during the interaction between C1 and Administrator and observed the interaction. Therefore there was sufficient evidence to corroborate with the allegation.

Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 1 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D.

Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided along with appeal rights.