Complaint Investigation Report

Based on interviews and records reviewed by the Department, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that S3 interacted in an inappropriate sexual manner with Client #1 (C1).

Observations and interviews with C1 revealed that C1 had difficulty answering detailed questions. W5 interjected questioning during the police interview with C1. W5 stated when he/she arrived at the facility on 10/24/22; the door was found locked which was odd to W5. S1 stated that C3 compulsively locks the facility doors during the day. S2 stated, “The front door to the facility stays unlocked during the day but it is locked at nighttime and sometimes the clients lock the door to their own room”. S3 stated, “The facility typically stays unlocked during the day.” C2 and S4 stated that C3 does lock doors which would explain why the front door was possibly locked when W5 arrived. S2 has never heard of anyone complaining about S1. C2 stated he/she doesn’t believe S1 touched C1 and that C1 is telling the truth. S4 stated, “…sexually assaulting C1 would be very different from who S1 is”. C3 said he/she has never been touched inappropriately by a staff member and has not seen another client touched inappropriately.

Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.

Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Joy Bisaha, Care Staff.