Complaint Investigation Report
found no discrepancy or use of funds on items that were not for the benefit of C1’s care and wellbeing. Evidence obtained during the investigation reflected that C1 consented to participation in outings on which funds were expended; the investigation did not yield evidence that C1 was not able to give consent to participate in outings and activities for which C1’s personal funds were utilized.
It was also alleged that a chemical laxative was administered to C1, although C1’s responsible party directed facility staff to utilize a natural fiber program. A review of C1’s medical records revealed that C1’s physician prescribed medication that acts as a laxative for constipation to be administered on a routine basis. Licensee nor facility staff have the ability to disregard administration of medication prescribed for the client at the direction of the client’s responsible party or any other party. Discontinuance of medication or change in physician’s orders can only be effectuated at the direction of C1’s physician.
Based upon all of the foregoing, the allegations are unsubstantiated. This finding means that although the allegations may have happened or may be valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violations occurred.
An exit interview was conducted with Elena O'Connor, and a copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided to the Program Manager at the conclusion of the visit.
Source: California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing. Methodology · Report a correction