Complaint Investigation Report

the C1s back. Per interviews with a third party witness a special/unusual injury report and or notes from the meeting that was held was not in C1's file for review. C1 attended a local day program as well as resides at the home, at the time of the incident the facility was licensed as a group home.

Furthermore, per Licensee at the time of the incident, the day program was contacted during this time frame and found that there were no reports or observations noted that detail any incidents that occurred with C1 that might have caused C1 to have a shoe print on the back.

C1 was unable to be interviewed due to communication barriers. The allegation that a resident had unexplained shoe print on their back is found to be unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred.

An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Manuel Vazquez.